We may not love “religion”, but does Jesus?

With all of the recent buzz surrounding our diagnosis of “religion”, I felt it necessary to chime in…briefly.

There are many ways to approach this topic, and for the record I think this is a good conversation to have. Furthermore, I believe many are asking the wrong questions as each individual’s perspective on the nature of religion will vary according to their experience with the church and scriptures. Bottom line, truth is not subjective but our interpretation of religion is.

I recently read Matthew 23 and found some insight.

“Then Jesus said to the crowds and to his disciples, “The scribes and the Pharisees sit on Moses’ seat,”
(Matthew 23:1-2 ESV)

A way of translating this might be to say: “The Pharisees have taken Moses license and office”. This may very well have been a self appointed position since they did have some authority in matters of the law (Deut 17:9), but they had far exceeded their jurisdiction.

“So do and observe whatever they tell you, but not the works they do. For they preach, but do not practice. They tie up heavy burdens, hard to bear, and lay them on people’s shoulders, but they themselves are not willing to move them with their finger.”
(Matthew 23:3-4 ESV)

Now, it is important to take note of two things.

1. Jesus is NOT doing away with the law, instead He affirms its authority and power. In fact, He even encourages obedience to the expressed preaching of the Pharisees (pending it aligns with God’s word)!

2. Jesus IS publicly condemning the promotion of extra-biblical traditions. He explicitly stands in opposition to their expectations as it creates unnecessary “burdens” (v.4) and obstacles for the people.

So, what is the difference between the two?

God’s law is a gracious thing. It was intended to reveal the goodness and wisdom of God, bring awareness of sin and guilt, and show the need for divine redemption (Leviticus 17:11; Galatians 3:24; Romans 3:19-20; 7:7-13; 1 Timothy 1:7-11). The law, however, was not given to be utilized as a performance-based means of salvation. Moreover, when it is, even good things become bad things. This is what the Pharisees used to keep authoritative control over the people and I believe this is what Jefferson Bethke intended to convey in his poem. When we create obstacles beyond faith, we actually rob people of the very thing we hope for them to experience: grace.

“You shut the kingdom of heaven in people’s faces. For you neither enter yourselves nor allow those who would enter to go in.”(Matt 23:13)

This entry was posted in Latest News, Thoughts and Theology. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to We may not love “religion”, but does Jesus?

  1. Shirleyan says:

    I also love the movie “Return to Me”. You are so right Joan. We can never know true acceptance eecxpt through the Lord who loves us so unconditionally. Being a first-born with people pleaser tendencies and wishing for a father’s love that I didn’t have, has been something I had to struggle through and learn from. I am so grateful for my Lord and Savior and for how He has shown me what true acceptance and love really is. He has done a great work in me and I am so thankful. I just found your blog today. What a blessing it is.Lee Ann

    • Fernanda says:

      Christmas is a collection of pagan feitsvals that the church tried to hijack and failed!! They therefore celebrate a pagan festival and surely if Jesus existed he would be repelled by that!!But what of Jesus himself?There is not one single mention of Jesus in the entire Roman record that is right not one!!! At the same time as he was supposed to have been around there were a number of Jews claiming to be the messiah all of whom are well recorded!!He was supposed to have been a huge problem to the Romans and produced wonderful miracles but still not one contemporary record?Even the bible mentions of him like all other references were not written until many years after his supposed death!!At best he was an amalgam of those others!!

      • jordan says:

        This is such an unbelievably inaccurate statement. So, because of that, I believe the burden of even a sliver of evidence is on you. Thanks.

        • Soma says:

          is that an individual is eenltitd to his own religion and shouldn’t be judged by extremists. However, anyone who would design society to fit their religious beliefs either at the point of a gun or with specious morality claims can count himself no better than any other tin pot fascist.We all need justification for our behavior. Insanity seems to find in fundamentalism a broad and easy channel in which to flow. It is an interesting coincidence that God’s desires always seem to jibe with those of his true believers.Thank you for your feedback.

      • Lyndall says:

        Wow! Great thniikng! JK